Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:27
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump says 'it's possible' US gets involved in Israel-Iran conflict - ABC News
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
NASA discovers that Earth's twin planet, Venus, is not geologically dead - Earth.com
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What are some uses for cucumbers other than eating them plain or in salads?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Health officials warn of measles case from traveler at Dulles Airport - The Washington Post
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Seven years later, Nintendo fans beat Switch game even the devs didn’t - Polygon
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why do you allow your cat to lie in bed with you?
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
James Cook faces the heat from Bills beat reporters - Buffalo Rumblings